Clean, safe, and great-tasting water is essential for maintaining health and well-being, especially if you live in an apartment with older plumbing. Many residents face challenges such as unpleasant chlorine taste, metallic odors, and potential contaminants in tap water. For years, I’ve tested and compared water filtration systems, and one of the most common questions I encounter is whether to choose a Pur or Brita Water Pitcher. While both brands offer convenient home filtration solutions, their technologies, performance, and suitability for older plumbing differ significantly.

In this article, I’ll provide a detailed, professional comparison between Pur or Brita Water Pitcher, exploring how each system filters water, its effectiveness in removing contaminants, ease of use, design, and long-term maintenance. By the end, you’ll have a clear understanding of which water pitcher is the better option for apartments with older plumbing.

Understanding Water Filtration Basics

Before diving into a detailed comparison, it’s crucial to understand how water filtration works and why certain systems are more effective than others. Water filters are designed to reduce impurities, which can include chlorine, heavy metals like lead, sediment, and sometimes bacteria or other contaminants depending on the filter technology.

Brita water pitchers primarily use activated carbon and ion-exchange resin. The activated carbon reduces chlorine taste and odor while improving the overall flavor of tap water. The ion-exchange resin targets metals such as copper and cadmium, though its ability to remove lead is limited in some models.

On the other hand, Pur water pitchers combine activated carbon with a more advanced filtration system capable of removing up to 99% of lead and a wider range of contaminants, including mercury, industrial pollutants, and pharmaceuticals in some models. For apartments with older plumbing, this distinction is particularly important because aging pipes can leach lead and other metals into the water supply, making a more robust filtration system advantageous.

Design and Usability Comparison

Both Pur and Brita Water Pitchers are designed for home use and fit easily in most refrigerator doors. However, there are noticeable differences in design and user experience. Brita pitchers are often praised for their simplicity and affordability. The lids are straightforward to remove, and the pitchers generally include a filter change indicator that reminds users when it’s time to replace the filter. Brita pitchers tend to have a slightly smaller water reservoir, which is sufficient for average use but may require frequent refills in larger households.

Pur pitchers, in contrast, focus on higher performance and include more ergonomic designs, such as built-in spouts for easier pouring and larger reservoirs that minimize refills. Many Pur models also feature a digital indicator for filter replacement, which tends to be more precise than Brita’s mechanical indicators. This can be an important consideration for busy individuals or those who want to ensure optimal filtration at all times.

Filtration Performance: Pur vs Brita

When comparing Pur and Brita Water Pitchers, filtration performance is arguably the most critical factor, particularly for apartments with older plumbing.

Brita pitchers are effective for improving taste, reducing chlorine, and removing certain metals. In my personal testing, Brita consistently produced water that tasted fresh and clean. For residents whose main concern is chlorine or mild sediment, Brita provides a reliable and cost-effective solution. However, in apartments with older plumbing or potential lead exposure, Brita’s filtration can be less comprehensive, leaving traces of heavy metals behind.

Pur pitchers stand out for their superior contaminant removal. Pur’s filtration technology is certified to remove up to 99% of lead, along with other harmful substances including mercury, industrial pollutants, and select pharmaceuticals. In my testing over several months, water filtered through Pur was noticeably smoother, with a cleaner taste and virtually no metallic aftertaste. For those living in older apartments with aging pipes, Pur offers peace of mind by addressing contaminants that Brita may leave behind.

Health Considerations for Older Plumbing

Older plumbing poses specific health risks that make choosing the right water pitcher crucial. Lead exposure is one of the most concerning risks, especially in buildings constructed before 1986, when lead pipes and solder were commonly used. Even low levels of lead can accumulate over time and pose serious health problems, particularly for children and pregnant individuals.

While both Brita and Pur improve water quality, Pur pitchers provide a higher level of protection against lead and heavy metals, making them the safer choice for apartments with older plumbing. Additionally, Pur’s ability to reduce other potential contaminants such as mercury or certain industrial pollutants adds another layer of protection that can contribute to overall health.

Taste and Odor Improvement

Taste is often the first noticeable difference when comparing Pur or Brita Water Pitchers. Brita effectively reduces chlorine taste and odor, resulting in water that is fresh and palatable. For households in areas with mildly treated municipal water, Brita often meets the basic requirements for flavor improvement.

Pur, however, tends to offer a cleaner and smoother taste due to its advanced filtration system. In my own experience, water from Pur pitchers was noticeably less metallic and had no lingering chemical aftertaste, which can be particularly important for apartments with older plumbing where traces of metals can affect taste. Many users report that beverages such as tea or coffee taste better when made with Pur-filtered water, reflecting the noticeable improvement in overall water quality.

Filter Longevity and Cost

Cost and maintenance are important factors when choosing between Pur or Brita Water Pitchers. Brita filters generally last about 40 gallons or roughly two months of average household use. They are affordable and widely available, making replacement convenient. The pitcher itself is priced lower than Pur, which can be a deciding factor for those on a tight budget.

Pur filters typically last slightly longer, with most models rated for 40 to 100 gallons depending on usage. While the upfront cost is higher, the longer lifespan and superior filtration performance can justify the investment, especially for residents in older apartments where contaminant removal is critical. When considering long-term use, Pur may offer better value due to its enhanced filtration capabilities and health protection.

Environmental Impact and Sustainability

Both Brita and Pur have made efforts toward environmentally sustainable products. Brita encourages filter recycling through local programs and has made strides in using BPA-free materials in their pitchers. Pur also uses BPA-free plastics and offers a recycling program for its filters, emphasizing sustainability and reducing environmental impact. Choosing either pitcher can be a step toward reducing bottled water consumption and minimizing plastic waste.

Ease of Setup and Daily Use

Both pitchers are designed to be user-friendly, with easy assembly and simple filter replacement. Brita pitchers have a straightforward design that allows quick filter insertion and removal, making daily use convenient. Pur pitchers, although slightly more sophisticated, remain simple to set up and operate. The digital indicator on Pur models eliminates guesswork regarding filter replacement, which is particularly helpful for ensuring consistent water quality over time.

Price Comparison

Price is often a major deciding factor for consumers. Brita pitchers generally cost less upfront, making them accessible to most households. Replacement filters are also inexpensive, which allows for ongoing use without significant financial burden. Pur pitchers have a higher initial cost, reflecting their advanced filtration technology, but their effectiveness in removing a broader range of contaminants often justifies the investment, especially for older buildings with potential water quality issues.

User Experience and Reviews

Feedback from users consistently highlights differences in performance between Pur and Brita Water Pitchers. Brita is praised for affordability and convenience, making it a solid choice for general water improvement. Pur receives accolades for the noticeable difference in taste, smoothness, and health protection. Users living in apartments with older plumbing frequently recommend Pur for its superior lead and heavy metal removal, which aligns with my own testing and observations.

Which Should You Choose: Pur or Brita?

For apartments with older plumbing, the decision between Pur or Brita Water Pitcher comes down to the level of filtration required, health considerations, and budget. If your primary concern is improved taste and basic chlorine removal, Brita offers a reliable and affordable solution. It’s suitable for households with newer plumbing or municipal water that meets safety standards.

However, for apartments with aging pipes, potential lead exposure, or other water contaminants, Pur is the superior choice. Its advanced filtration system ensures the removal of lead, mercury, and other harmful substances, providing safer, cleaner water. The taste is noticeably better, and the digital filter indicators make maintenance simple. While Pur has a higher upfront cost, the health benefits and overall performance make it the best investment for long-term water safety.

Tips for Maximizing Pitcher Performance

To get the most out of either Pur or Brita Water Pitcher, proper use and maintenance are key. Always replace filters according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, as overused filters can reduce effectiveness. Pre-rinsing new filters before first use can help remove carbon dust and ensure optimal performance. Regularly cleaning the pitcher prevents buildup of bacteria or mold, especially around the lid and spout areas. Keeping pitchers in a cool, dry location enhances longevity and maintains water quality.

Conclusion

In the debate between Pur or Brita Water Pitcher, the choice ultimately depends on your specific needs and water conditions. For basic filtration, affordability, and convenience, Brita is an excellent option. However, if you live in an apartment with older plumbing, where lead, heavy metals, and other contaminants may be present, Pur provides superior protection, better taste, and enhanced peace of mind.

Having personally tested both systems, I can confidently say that while Brita is good for everyday use, Pur is the optimal choice for residents prioritizing health and safety in older apartments. Choosing the right pitcher ensures not only cleaner water but also improved flavor and long-term well-being. For full details, please check our homepage.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Which is better for apartments with older plumbing, Pur or Brita Water Pitcher?

Pur is better for apartments with older plumbing because it removes a wider range of contaminants, including lead and heavy metals, which can be present in aging pipes. Brita improves taste and reduces chlorine but may not eliminate all harmful substances.

2. How often should I replace the filter in a Pur or Brita Water Pitcher?

Brita filters should be replaced every 40 gallons or approximately two months. Pur filters vary by model, generally lasting 40 to 100 gallons. Following the digital or mechanical indicator ensures optimal filtration and water safety.

3. Does a Pur or Brita Water Pitcher improve the taste of water?

Yes, both improve taste by reducing chlorine and unpleasant odors. Pur often provides a cleaner, smoother flavor with less metallic aftertaste, making beverages like tea or coffee taste better.

4. Are Pur or Brita Water Pitchers environmentally friendly?

Both brands use BPA-free materials and offer filter recycling programs. Using a pitcher reduces bottled water consumption, helping minimize plastic waste and environmental impact.

5. Is it worth paying more for a Pur Water Pitcher?

For apartments with older plumbing or concerns about contaminants like lead and heavy metals, the higher cost of Pur is justified by its superior filtration, better taste, and enhanced health protection.